Talk:Prize shelf: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ukelele (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I've moved tris page from Price Shelf to Price shelf, according to the naming conventions. But on the category page [[:Category:Supporter Features]] this page still appears as Price Shelf. Anybody got a clue on why this is? --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 09:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
I've moved tris page from Price Shelf to Price shelf, according to the naming conventions. But on the category page [[:Category:Supporter Features]] this page still appears as Price Shelf. Anybody got a clue on why this is? --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 09:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
:::nevermind, it's ok now. --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 13:29, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
:::nevermind, it's ok now. --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 13:29, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
----
Shouldn't "Champion of the I. division" be called "Champion of Division II" since most countries (all, but Sweden?) have division II following the top league? If no one objects, I will change this. Also, I will change how it is written. In German, one puts a point (.) after a number to show that it is to be the ordinal form (e.g. ''1'' is ''one'' and ''1.'' is ''first'' in German). However, this is not the case in English.--[[User:Assyrian Master|Assyrian Master]] 21:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:24, 5 October 2006

I've moved tris page from Price Shelf to Price shelf, according to the naming conventions. But on the category page Category:Supporter Features this page still appears as Price Shelf. Anybody got a clue on why this is? --ukelele 09:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

nevermind, it's ok now. --ukelele 13:29, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Shouldn't "Champion of the I. division" be called "Champion of Division II" since most countries (all, but Sweden?) have division II following the top league? If no one objects, I will change this. Also, I will change how it is written. In German, one puts a point (.) after a number to show that it is to be the ordinal form (e.g. 1 is one and 1. is first in German). However, this is not the case in English.--Assyrian Master 21:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)