Talk:Skills: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Serafimul (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Serafimul (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
Serafimul:
Serafimul:
That would be nice. But if we are to extend those subjects maybe would be easier to split it in different pages.
That would be nice. But if we are to extend those subjects maybe would be easier to split it in different pages.
---
I don't think that making the font-size smaller will help anyone.

Revision as of 19:18, 24 November 2005

how about putting in information rather than just cold facts and lists like inform that anything below weak is worthless. a discussion on multi-skilled players and what constitutes a high secondary. Maybe a discussion on what counts as a very high skill in something. What level of skill is state of the art. when do wages become a real problem. etc

discussion about form, what is average form level, can you expect your players to be inadequate, passable or solid on average?


Serafimul: That would be nice. But if we are to extend those subjects maybe would be easier to split it in different pages. --- I don't think that making the font-size smaller will help anyone.