Talk:Offensive defenders tactic: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
/Burner | /Burner | ||
:I disagree on two points: | |||
:1) Naming a common tactic with a people name ''can'' be NPOV, e.g., in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_kiss this Wikipedia article]. | |||
:2) «Offensive defenders tactic» is more explicit, but also unaccurate, since it gives the impression that only the defenders, and not the midfield, is used offensively. [[User:Zigkill|Zigkill]] 22:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:38, 1 July 2006
I quote an extract from the original wikipedia project :
« NPOV (Neutral Point Of View) is a fundamental Wikipedia principle which states that all articles must be written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly and without bias. This includes maps, reader-facing templates, categories and portals. According to Wikipedia founder Jimbo Wales, NPOV is "absolute and non-negotiable." »
Naming a common tactic with a people name is far from neutral, especially since such a denomination is quite confidential. (At least it is unknown in France.)
So I changed the name from « Norwegian tactics » to a more neutral and explicit name « Offensive defenders tactic ».
/Burner
- I disagree on two points:
- 1) Naming a common tactic with a people name can be NPOV, e.g., in this Wikipedia article.
- 2) «Offensive defenders tactic» is more explicit, but also unaccurate, since it gives the impression that only the defenders, and not the midfield, is used offensively. Zigkill 22:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
