Talk:National teams: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Mr Wednesday (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::Hmmm, maybe that is the better option. I guess I should have paid attention to the plurality. And also, it seems so unprofessional to make a link <nowiki>[[stuff]]s instead of [[Stuff|stuffs]]</nowiki>. Then again, I'm just a perfectionist. :-) Perhaps to solve plurality, we should come to a consensus on which one. I don't see a reason to change it further, unless enough people feel that National_team is definitely the way to go. [[User:Kc-jake|-- Jake]] 16:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | ::Hmmm, maybe that is the better option. I guess I should have paid attention to the plurality. And also, it seems so unprofessional to make a link <nowiki>[[stuff]]s instead of [[Stuff|stuffs]]</nowiki>. Then again, I'm just a perfectionist. :-) Perhaps to solve plurality, we should come to a consensus on which one. I don't see a reason to change it further, unless enough people feel that National_team is definitely the way to go. [[User:Kc-jake|-- Jake]] 16:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
:::If wikipedia can automagically produce the correct links for me, I'm all for doing less typing. :) --[[User:Mr Wednesday|Mr Wednesday]] 16:09, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:09, 18 August 2006
I think we could reasonably add that U-20 teams have a much greater importance in the hattrick world than in real football, because they are a good indicators of the actual wealth of countries. Historical hattrick countries have not much advantages over young countries. What do you think ?
Cocobingo.
Moved
I moved National_Teams to National_teams in accordance with policy on Hattrick:Naming_conventions. -- Jake 15:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Should it be National_teams or National_team? (Note that links of the form [[National team]]s would still appear as National teams then...) --Mr Wednesday 16:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Answering my own question: Looking at the "some should be plural", I think it's a borderline case, probably better left plural. --Mr Wednesday 16:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm, maybe that is the better option. I guess I should have paid attention to the plurality. And also, it seems so unprofessional to make a link [[stuff]]s instead of [[Stuff|stuffs]]. Then again, I'm just a perfectionist. :-) Perhaps to solve plurality, we should come to a consensus on which one. I don't see a reason to change it further, unless enough people feel that National_team is definitely the way to go. -- Jake 16:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- If wikipedia can automagically produce the correct links for me, I'm all for doing less typing. :) --Mr Wednesday 16:09, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
