Talk:All-out Attack: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
In the Netherlands some swear by all-offensive --> This all-out-tactics tactic;-) Defensive forwards don't always make sense then, though some use it. | |||
I might write that article one day, but not tonight;-): --[[User:GM-Lau|GM-Lau]] 04:47, 26 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:47, 26 November 2005
Am I the only one who thinks this is not all that "all out" a tactic?
3-5-2 with 2 WTM, 2 OCD, 1 WB played offensive, and 2 Defensive Forwards, playing AIM...now that would be maximsing possession.
Oh well...not my label. BTW, I've never heard of this label used before.
Og the Dim
In the Netherlands some swear by all-offensive --> This all-out-tactics tactic;-) Defensive forwards don't always make sense then, though some use it.
I might write that article one day, but not tonight;-): --GM-Lau 04:47, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
