Talk:Rules: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Orestes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Agree, partly
Line 15: Line 15:
----
----
This page is WAY too big. Noone will read that. It '''must''' be splitted in smaller chunks.--[[User:Serafimul|Serafimul]] 16:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
This page is WAY too big. Noone will read that. It '''must''' be splitted in smaller chunks.--[[User:Serafimul|Serafimul]] 16:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
== Agree, partly ==
I tend to agree with LA-Motto, that duplicating the rules here as well seems too much. But I've doing it, formating and making the tables, sections and whatever. It seems no one else is doing it, if anyone else think it's pointless let me know. Otherwise, I'm taking it to the end, step by step.
Genju, Portugal

Revision as of 17:17, 28 November 2005

I also agree that an external link needs to be put to the hattrick rules. It would also be a good idea to table, or at least bulet the currency conversions


Do we really need to duplicate Rules in Hattrick wiki? I think, it would suffice to have a like to Hattrick rules page. Few reasons:

  • Hattrick rules are constantly changing to reflect changes (it would be harldy possible to track these changes here)
  • Hattrick rules are supported in all Hattrick languages
  • Hattrick rules show ammount corresponding currencies, and not in some hardcoded currency.

/LA-Motto


rules to much

If your gonna have the rules on wiki, they need to be condensed or be broken up better. The page is way to long.


This page is WAY too big. Noone will read that. It must be splitted in smaller chunks.--Serafimul 16:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Agree, partly

I tend to agree with LA-Motto, that duplicating the rules here as well seems too much. But I've doing it, formating and making the tables, sections and whatever. It seems no one else is doing it, if anyone else think it's pointless let me know. Otherwise, I'm taking it to the end, step by step.

Genju, Portugal