Talk:Regainer: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Septimusjm (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Right. Until the post has been cited, I'm taking the HT-quote off this page. This is the only place I've heard it and, without a link to the original post, it sounds like a rumor. The sentence read, "According to Ht-Johan regainer is a player who takes the lost attack chances." --[[User:Septimusjm|septimusjm]] 15:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | Right. Until the post has been cited, I'm taking the HT-quote off this page. This is the only place I've heard it and, without a link to the original post, it sounds like a rumor. The sentence read, "According to Ht-Johan regainer is a player who takes the lost attack chances." --[[User:Septimusjm|septimusjm]] 15:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
* To me that sounds like something someone made up, though admittedly it is in the cryptic manner often present in HTs' posts. I agree though no citation, no conclusion. -[[User:Catalyst|Catalyst]] 20:38:41, 2006-10-03 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:38, 3 October 2006
HT-Johan
If someone could track down the conf. post where he says what this specialty does, that's something that should be reproduced here. I'll try to get it later on, if nobody else does. --Mr Wednesday 14:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Right. Until the post has been cited, I'm taking the HT-quote off this page. This is the only place I've heard it and, without a link to the original post, it sounds like a rumor. The sentence read, "According to Ht-Johan regainer is a player who takes the lost attack chances." --septimusjm 15:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- To me that sounds like something someone made up, though admittedly it is in the cryptic manner often present in HTs' posts. I agree though no citation, no conclusion. -Catalyst 20:38:41, 2006-10-03 (UTC)
