Talk:Abbreviations: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please link the full name description, not the acronym. | Please link the full name description, not the acronym. | ||
I think, that we should | I think, that we should exclude abreviations like AFAIK, IMHO, LOL, etc. For those we can refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_slang | ||
Revision as of 00:21, 26 November 2005
Please link the full name description, not the acronym.
I think, that we should exclude abreviations like AFAIK, IMHO, LOL, etc. For those we can refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_slang
I have a question regarding the inclusion of Federation acronyms in this list, should them be allowed? In my opinion they should be kept out of the list, since they are not used as widely as the "universal" abbreviations (WO, GM, MOD, FW, ...); it would be hard to tell the line between a "know federation that enters this list" and a "highly popular federation, but not enough for the list". I also think abbreviations such as LOL, BTL, ROFL should not be included, since they are not specific to Hattrick. I see this list as a list of HT-specific acronyms that are accepted by the majority of HT-users.--duno7 21:37, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
I agree federations and forum-slang should be kept out,
