Talk:Notable matches: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
Formatting... |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Name== | |||
Isn't it ''Notable'' as in ''worthy of notice'' rather than ''Noticeable'' as in '' likely to be noticed''? Not entirely sure tho, but we use ''Notable players'' for players, so why not for matches? --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 18:59, March 4, 2009 (UTC) | Isn't it ''Notable'' as in ''worthy of notice'' rather than ''Noticeable'' as in '' likely to be noticed''? Not entirely sure tho, but we use ''Notable players'' for players, so why not for matches? --[[User:EchoMan|EchoMan]] 18:59, March 4, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:It's okay with me to move it to Notable matches. I looked for a an article like this about players and I only found [[Funny names]]. --[[User:Rob184|Rob184]] 19:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Category== | |||
What category should be added to this article? --[[User:Rob184|Rob184]] 19:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:09, 4 March 2009
Name
Isn't it Notable as in worthy of notice rather than Noticeable as in likely to be noticed? Not entirely sure tho, but we use Notable players for players, so why not for matches? --EchoMan 18:59, March 4, 2009 (UTC)
- It's okay with me to move it to Notable matches. I looked for a an article like this about players and I only found Funny names. --Rob184 19:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Category
What category should be added to this article? --Rob184 19:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
