Talk:Rules: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Genju, Portugal | Genju, Portugal | ||
---- | |||
I thinks it's usefull primaraly for linking pruposes. If the headings are placed correctly it could be handy. Instead of reffering to or quoting the rules a link would be nice. --[[User:Ukelele|ukelele]] 00:03, 30 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:03, 30 November 2005
I also agree that an external link needs to be put to the hattrick rules. It would also be a good idea to table, or at least bulet the currency conversions
Do we really need to duplicate Rules in Hattrick wiki? I think, it would suffice to have a like to Hattrick rules page. Few reasons:
- Hattrick rules are constantly changing to reflect changes (it would be harldy possible to track these changes here)
- Hattrick rules are supported in all Hattrick languages
- Hattrick rules show ammount corresponding currencies, and not in some hardcoded currency.
/LA-Motto
rules to much
If your gonna have the rules on wiki, they need to be condensed or be broken up better. The page is way to long.
This page is WAY too big. Noone will read that. It must be splitted in smaller chunks.--Serafimul 16:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Agree, partly
I tend to agree with LA-Motto, that duplicating the rules here as well seems too much. But I've been doing it, formating and making the tables, sections and whatever. It seems no one else is doing it, if anyone else think it's pointless let me know. Otherwise, I'm taking it to the end, step by step.
Genju, Portugal
I thinks it's usefull primaraly for linking pruposes. If the headings are placed correctly it could be handy. Instead of reffering to or quoting the rules a link would be nice. --ukelele 00:03, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
