Category talk:Zones: Difference between revisions
From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do we need this? It's rather ugly, and repeats categories unnecessarily. | Do we need this? It's rather ugly, and repeats categories unnecessarily. | ||
---- | |||
I suggest that we redirect the non-category pages to the category pages (for example, [[Northern Europe]] would be redirected to [[:Category:Northern Europe]]). This way we would avoid repetition, and the only proper articles would be the ones for the countries themselves. We could deal the same way with the [[Zone]] page and probably others. Is there any drawback on this approach I am not aware of? I have changed [[Asia, Africa and Oceania]] as an example. --[[User:Duno7|duno7]] 18:38, 28 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:38, 28 November 2005
Do we need this? It's rather ugly, and repeats categories unnecessarily.
I suggest that we redirect the non-category pages to the category pages (for example, Northern Europe would be redirected to Category:Northern Europe). This way we would avoid repetition, and the only proper articles would be the ones for the countries themselves. We could deal the same way with the Zone page and probably others. Is there any drawback on this approach I am not aware of? I have changed Asia, Africa and Oceania as an example. --duno7 18:38, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
