HatStats: Difference between revisions
BovarLilie (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Interwiki/Hatstats}} | {{Interwiki/Hatstats}} | ||
[http://www.hatstats.net Hatstats] is a statistics website for Hattrick matches. It was originally created and maintained by an [[Oceania]] Hattrick player, Griggle. It has since been re-released by [[GM-Cyntech]]. Griggle used a numerical score based on the teams ratings in the match as an overall measurement compare the teams. This rating has since become an integral feature of many other statistical websites and programs. | |||
On 8 July 2011, [[GM-Cyntech]] announced the return of Hatstats[http://hattrickunited.org/cyntech/2011/07/08/the-return-of-hatstats/], revamped for CHPP 2.0 in the light of Alltid's demise in 2011. It was re-released, initially for Oceania, on February 7, 2012. | |||
__FORCETOC__ | __FORCETOC__ | ||
== | == HatStats Rating == | ||
=== How it's calculated === | |||
It is calculated from the [[ratings]] as follows: | It is calculated from the [[ratings]] as follows: | ||
* HatStats = (3 * [[Midfield]] rating) + [[Attack]] rating + [[Defence]] Rating | * HatStats = (3 * [[Midfield]] rating) + [[Attack]] rating + [[Defence]] Rating | ||
| Line 90: | Line 83: | ||
== Notes == | === Notes === | ||
The rating may not agree exactly with the [[Supporter]] Statistics function "Best Match Ever", due to differences in the way the two are calculated, but both are intended as a quick summary of a team's performance in a match. Due to several factors ([[tactics]], actual distribution of [[scoring opportunities]]), it is not necessarily the most accurate way to determine which team was most likely to win a game, but it's a quick and easy way to get a rough idea of the relative strengths of teams. Other, more complex, rating systems take tactics, scoring chance distribution, and various other factors into account, but this is at the cost of the simplicity and ease of calculation that Hatstats ratings provide. | The rating may not agree exactly with the [[Supporter]] Statistics function "Best Match Ever", due to differences in the way the two are calculated, but both are intended as a quick summary of a team's performance in a match. Due to several factors ([[tactics]], actual distribution of [[scoring opportunities]]), it is not necessarily the most accurate way to determine which team was most likely to win a game, but it's a quick and easy way to get a rough idea of the relative strengths of teams. Other, more complex, rating systems take tactics, scoring chance distribution, and various other factors into account, but this is at the cost of the simplicity and ease of calculation that Hatstats ratings provide. | ||
| Line 98: | Line 91: | ||
* [[LoddarStats]] | * [[LoddarStats]] | ||
* [[PStats]] | * [[PStats]] | ||
==References== | |||
# [http://hattrickunited.org/cyntech/2011/07/08/the-return-of-hatstats/ "The Return of Hatstats"], GM-Cyntech's Hattrick United Blog, 08/07/2011; | |||
[[Category:Helper Applications]] | [[Category:Helper Applications]] | ||
Latest revision as of 04:14, 11 June 2012
| INTERWIKI |
|---|
· English · Magyar · Português brasileiro · Русский ·
Hatstats is a statistics website for Hattrick matches. It was originally created and maintained by an Oceania Hattrick player, Griggle. It has since been re-released by GM-Cyntech. Griggle used a numerical score based on the teams ratings in the match as an overall measurement compare the teams. This rating has since become an integral feature of many other statistical websites and programs.
On 8 July 2011, GM-Cyntech announced the return of Hatstats[1], revamped for CHPP 2.0 in the light of Alltid's demise in 2011. It was re-released, initially for Oceania, on February 7, 2012.
HatStats Rating
How it's calculated
It is calculated from the ratings as follows:
The Attack and Defence Ratings are simply added up from the left, middle and right ratings. The ratings have to be transformed from skills into numbers first, of course. This is done the following way:
| HatStat value per rating | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denomination | very low | low | high | very high |
| disastrous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| wretched | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| poor | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| weak | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| inadequate | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| passable | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| solid | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| excellent | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 |
| formidable | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 |
| outstanding | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 |
| brilliant | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 |
| magnificent | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 |
| world class | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 |
| supernatural | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 |
| titanic | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
| extra-terrestrial | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 |
| mythical | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 |
| magical | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 |
| utopian | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 |
| divine | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 |
Notes
The rating may not agree exactly with the Supporter Statistics function "Best Match Ever", due to differences in the way the two are calculated, but both are intended as a quick summary of a team's performance in a match. Due to several factors (tactics, actual distribution of scoring opportunities), it is not necessarily the most accurate way to determine which team was most likely to win a game, but it's a quick and easy way to get a rough idea of the relative strengths of teams. Other, more complex, rating systems take tactics, scoring chance distribution, and various other factors into account, but this is at the cost of the simplicity and ease of calculation that Hatstats ratings provide.
See also
References
- "The Return of Hatstats", GM-Cyntech's Hattrick United Blog, 08/07/2011;
