5-3-2: Difference between revisions

From Hattrick
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Two examples of formations added.
Line 1: Line 1:
5-3-2 is mostly used for [[training]] [[defenders]]
5-3-2 is mostly used for [[training]] [[defenders]]


It is generally seen as one of the weakest formations, as it is very difficult to achieve good ratings in midfield and attack whilst using this formation.
It is generally seen as one of the weakest formations, as it is very difficult to achieve good ratings in midfield and attack whilst using this formation. But defending trainers will make use of this formation because it allows them to train 10 defenders in a week (2 matches with 5 defenders each). Because the defence ratings will be good, CA is a good option with 5-3-2, especially against teams that are equally strong or stronger. Here are some variations:
[[category:Formations]]
 
{{Line-up|
title = Formation A |
gk = GK |
wb_right = WBD |
cd_right = CD |
cd_left = IM |
wb_left = WBD |
w_right = E.CD |
im_right = IMO |
im_left = IMO |
w_left = E.CD |
f_right = FO |
f_left = FO |
}}
 
{{Line-up|
title = Formation B |
gk = GK |
wb_right = WBD |
cd_right = CD |
cd_left = CD |
wb_left = WBD |
w_right = E.CD |
im_right = IMO |
im_left = IMO |
w_left = WO |
f_right = FO |
f_left = FO |
}}
 
[category:Formations]]

Revision as of 18:10, 25 November 2005

5-3-2 is mostly used for training defenders

It is generally seen as one of the weakest formations, as it is very difficult to achieve good ratings in midfield and attack whilst using this formation. But defending trainers will make use of this formation because it allows them to train 10 defenders in a week (2 matches with 5 defenders each). Because the defence ratings will be good, CA is a good option with 5-3-2, especially against teams that are equally strong or stronger. Here are some variations:


Formation A
GK
WBD CD IM WBD
E.CD IMO IMO E.CD
FO FO



Formation B
GK
WBD CD CD WBD
E.CD IMO IMO WO
FO FO


[category:Formations]]